Sunday, 22 May 2016

Occult and Sexual symbols of the Vatican - the Babylonian Religion ressurected.

The babylonian religion with its pantheon of gods El, Baal, Ishtar and the likes are long gone. Or so we like to think. But what about the symbols below?

The eight pointed star is the star of Baal.

Baal was God the Son, the son of El, who according to ancient scriptures of Ur, if im not mistaken is God the Father of the ancient pagan religion. This symbol should have been banished a long long time ago when Christianity took root and finally stamped pagan religions in the near east and later on in the western world.

Unfortunately, it has not been banished. In fact, we see it in full display.

Here it is. On full display in the Vatican. How interesting, how very very interesting.

What does it mean? Why is this symbol being displayed here? And have you noticed the Obelisk at the centre of Baal's eight pointed star?

Where did this obelisk come from?

The Egyptian obelisk which is now located at St. Peter's Square is often called Vatican Obelisk. It is not known which Pharaoh has constructed it, but it is assumed that it was erected at Heliopolis around 2500 BC. Around 30 BC the obelisk was moved to Alexandria by Emperor Augustus and erected at the Julian Forum.

Why is there an Egyptian obelisk erected at St. Peter's Square ...

From Egypt of course, one of the oldest sources of Pagan worship.

But what is an Obelisk really?

Obelisk means Baal's shaft, or Baal's organ of Reproduction. To put it bluntly. 
It represents Baal's Penis.

Now why would Baal's penis be in the middle of this Eight pointed Star?

So you see? These symbols are present, subliminally it represent an obscene act
Nobody would ever have thought that something like that would ever be present in 
a religion that claims to be the True Christian Church.

What else can you see if you look at the Vatican from an aerial vantage point?

Do you see it? Its a female reproductive organ - The Womb. Sexual act blatantly
displayed. Typical of ancient pagan religions where sex is part of their
acts of worship.

you may also want to read:

Saturday, 21 May 2016

The real likeness of Jesus? I like his long hair though.

Do you wake up early in the morning and pray to this image?

Or do you turn your TV on at 3 o'clock in the afternoon to pray to this image?

We all know that Jesus/Yeshua is of middle eastern descent. He definitely would not have looked like the images above. These images depict of a man of , European lineage. To tell you the truth, this image is indeed of an European man - Spanish to be exact. Who is he?

According some sources, this man is Cesare Borgia. Son of Pope Alexander VI. One of the most corrupt popes of the catholic church in history. There is even a series depicting his story.


Here is a pic off some of the websites online.

Below is a picture file of a man from the Middle East:

As you can see, the skin tone is darker, and so is the facial hair. They have stronger facial features as well. Anybody wanting an image of Jesus should have an image similar to this one.

There is even an image of Jesus being put forward by researchers. Here it is:

Here's the video:

If the images of a white man, or make that European, posing as Jesus isn't really Jesus of Nazareth? What does it mean if you kneel, pray, and pay homage to it?

Its simple. They pray to a god who happens to be Cesare Borgia - the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI. 

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

God became human. What does it mean?

God-man our God?

Hosea 11:9

'I will not carry out my fierce anger, nor will I devastate Ephraim again. For I am God, and not a man-- the Holy One among you. I will not come against their cities.' NIV

He didn't say I am not LIKE a man, hence it is definite that God separates himself from being a man, both in being, and in character.

They say: 'You are taking it out of context!' but as said before, this is what the text of the scriptures say.

Isaiah 31:3

The Egyptians are man, and not God, and their horses are flesh, and not spirit. When the LORD stretches out his hand, the helper will stumble, and he who is helped will fall, and they will all perish together. [ESV]

INC doesn't normally use this verse, but all the same. It is clear. God is not a Man. God IS NOT Flesh.

Numbers 23:19

'"God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should repent; Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good? [NASB]

Ezekiel 28:2

"Son of man, give the prince of Tyre this message from the Sovereign LORD: "In your great pride you claim, 'I am a god! I sit on a divine throne in the heart of the sea.' But you are only a man and not a god, though you boast that you are a god. [NLT]

I think it is perfectly clear to us what God says about himself, he is God, Spirit, not Man/Flesh. But maybe God would change is mind and turn human to save them from sins? After all, everything is possible with God. Can he not do that? Surely his love for man would make him do anything!

Malachi 3:6

'I the LORD do not change. So you, the descendants of Jacob, are not destroyed.' [NIV]

They will say: You are taking this out of context! See, its about saving Israel, it says nothing about the LORD being able to change into human form!

Let's leave that for now.

Who is this LORD in all capital letters? is he the Father, Son, or Holy ghost?

Isaiah 63:6

'But you are our Father, though Abraham does not know us or Israel acknowledge us; you, LORD, are our Father, our Redeemer from of old is your name.'

They say: It's only one verse! you should be able to read the whole bible then you will know the truth! - We will answer that shortly.

Why is the LORD spelled in capital letters in english bibles, especially KJV?

So LORD is only a substitute for God's name which is:

Going back to their argument, here are the verses that prove that YHWH/LORD is the Father contrary to what catholic defenders are saying. The point is YHWH/LORD is, and wants his children to call him Father, not son, not holy ghost. 

Read more verses below:

Jeremiah 3:19-20

“‘I said,
How I would set you among my sons,
and give you a pleasant land,
a heritage most beautiful of all nations.
AndI thought you would call me, My Father,
and would not turn from following me.
Surely, as a treacherous wife leaves her husband,
so have you been treacherous to me, O house of Israel,
declares the LORD.’”

Deuteronomy 32:6 

Is this the way you repay the LORD, you foolish and unwise people? Is he not your Father, your Creator, who made you and formed you?

Isaiah 64:8

Yet you, LORD, are our Father. We are the clay, you are the potter; we are all the work of your hand.

Now, would the LORD [YHWH/YHVH] violate his own pronouncement? would he take back his own words? Remember he said he is NOT a Man, would he violate his statement? so that he could become human and save mankind? Surely he is God! nothing is impossible with him! He will do it for his love for mankind, wouldn't he?

But the scripture's say different:

Isaiah 31:1-2

Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help,
who rely on horses,
who trust in the multitude of their chariots
and in the great strength of their horsemen,
but do not look to the Holy One of Israel,
or seek help from the Lord.
2Yet he too is wise and can bring disaster;
he does not take back his words.
He will rise up against that wicked nation,
against those who help evildoers. [NIV]

You are taking this out of context! - they say. 

But the Bible says otherwise:

Hebrews 6:18

'so that we who have found refuge in him may find strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope set before us through two unchangeable things, since it is impossible for God to lie.' [NET bible]

John 17:1,17

After Jesus said this, he looked toward heaven and prayed:
“Father, the hour has come. Glorify your Son, that your Son may glorify you.

       'Sanctify them byd the truth; your word is truth'

We know that the true God who is LORD [YHVH] who is to be called Father will not change because:

James 1:17

'Whatever is good and perfect comes down to us from God our Father, who created all the lights in the heavens. He never changes or casts a shifting shadow.' [NLT]

Keep calm. God will never change and become Human, because that is what's explicitly written. So what of those other ones who preach that God became human? And what does it mean if God did become human after all?

It means that God can, at will, take back his word, repudiate, cancel it. And what else? It means we are all in trouble, because he is a liar, he cannot keep his word, so when he says he will save his people, it cannot be trusted, we may all be destroyed after all, because it is possible that God will cancel his words or promises for he has done it before.

But remember:

Malachi 3:6

'I the LORD do not change. So you, the descendants of Jacob, are not destroyed.' [NIV]

And who would dare imply that God is a liar? Well...Remember him?

Genesis 3:1

Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?

Tuesday, 17 May 2016

Interesting phrase from trinitarians, that 'Jesus was the PROTOTYPE human.'

|Quoting from the verse below:

Colossians 2:9

'For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.'

See! I told you! Jesus is God!

But wait a minute. Don't they teach that Jesus is both God and Human, what does that mean? What do they say about Jesus' Humanity?

Let the trinitarians answer this question. Right from their own mouths.

Did you read that bit? Again, let's focus on this underlined passage. Read below:

'We ought to think of Jesus as the prototype human being, not Adam.'

Was the author speaking about Adam, the individual we all know in the book of Genesis, or was he speaking in the 'Spirit' meaning, the spirit in him is revealing itself through its speech?

What does that mean? That the author KNEW what the word Adam meant when he wrote this sentence.

What do you mean by [he was speaking in the 'Spirit'?] about the author of that website?


But what does Adam mean in scriptures? Is it really a first name of a person like we nowadays think it is? the likes of Richard, Eric, William? Let's see what this Hebrew word Adam really means.

Adam in Hebrew means - Human in English, in fact, it even says in the scriptures that Adam is Flesh (Genesis 6:3). Now where does this PROTOHUMAN come into the picture? 

Going back to the article published by a trinitarian website where we read a bit of it implying that Jesus is NOT Adam/Flesh. What are they really saying? If we take into consideration what we have above, ISA version of Genesis 1:27 and Authorised Version of the bible, the spirit that was in the author of website on image capture/screenshot... simply saying that Jesus is - NOT a Human being AS DEFINED by God himself in the scriptures.

What does that mean? It means - God lied.

But who would dare say that?

So be careful people. Do not just accept any teaching, examine their words, for if they are of the Evil One, there will be a blip, even a keyhole where one can look and see the kind of spirit directing these people's speech.

Monday, 13 June 2011

Proof that God exists.

I have always adhered to the adage which says: To See is to Believe.

Yet there is no way to determine really if God exists by seeing is there? Yet I remain standing in my belief that God exists for the simple reason that I see with my own eyes the empirical evidence of such.

Meanwhile, those who claim to be rational beings expect to see an empirical evidence in establishing an existence of anything or anyone for that matter.

What is empirical evidence?

Taken from:

Empirical evidence (the record of one's direct observations or experiences) can be analyzed quantitatively or qualitatively. [^ Goodwin, C. J. (2005). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]

It states that Empirical Evidence is a record of one's direct observations or experiences. Therefore, The Bible can be used as an Empirical Evidence. Remember that the Scriptures is not only written by one man, it is better to have more than one witness for an assertion to be made more credible. Now let's see what statements the authors of the scriptures have to say about their observations:

According to Moses:

Deu 4:12 "And the LORD spoke to you out of the midst of the fire. You heard the sound of the words, but saw no form; [you] only [heard] a voice. [NKJV]

Apostle Paul wrote:

Col 1:15 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. [NKJV]

1Ti 1:17 Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honor and glory for ever and ever. Amen. [NKJV]

Two people have observed and wrote that God is invisible.

Now open your eyes and look around you. Do you see God?

Therefore God exists!

Now if there be any god you can actually see, this is not God.

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

Why should we not trust the KJV of the Bible 100%?

You hear many people say, I won't believe it unless its in the King James Bible, or others would say, nope - its not in my Catholic Bible - Duay Rheims. But are these bibles worthy of trusting a hundred percent? Others are being criticised for jumping from one version of the bible to the next. How do we know which of these bibles are trustworthy?

It is quite simple. The rule says:

Pro 30:6 Do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar.[NIV]
Deu 4:2 Do not add to what I command you and do not subtract from it, but keep the commands of the LORD your God that I give you.[NIV]

Note that I qouted the NIV at this instance, which i believe is correct at this point.

Going back to the verses, the King James Bible has done exactly that, as a matter of fact most english translations of the bible have done the same. For instance, when it comes to the Divine name of God which is YHWH, the King James bible, New International Version, New Living Translation, ESV, and many others have changed his Name YHWH for LORD in all capital letters, which in hebrew could be rendered as Adonay [Lord/Master/Owner] or Baal [Lord/Master].

A first example would be where LORD appears for the first time in the book of Genesis:

Gen 4:1 Adam [fn] lay with his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. [fn] She said, "With the help of the LORD I have brought forth [fn] a man."[New International Version]

Gen 4:1 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD [King James Version]

The Catholic version of the Bible: Duay Rheims version renders YHWH as Lord as well as you can see below:

Genesis 4:6 And the Lord said to him: Why art thou angry? and why is thy countenance fallen?

and the list goes on.

The Hebrew scriptures i.e. Masoretic Text is different, it has retained the Divine Name YHWH in their scriptures, yet read it aloud as Adonay or Lord in English, or Ha Shem - The Name in order to protect the name from being slandered or misused. Meanwhile rendering the Divine name as Yahweh by other Bible versions is also a mistake, apparently nobody knows how his name is spoken. And why not stick to what is actually there? YHWH.

Thus on this account alone, trusting any version of the english or any bible not written in Hebrew as the sole truth is simply being short-sighted.